Fast Street Racing
Everything there is about new fast cars
2006 Subaru Impreza WRX STI vs. 2006 Mitsubishi Evo IX
Author: visto12 Jun
www.edmunds.com Edmunds Inside Line brings digit awing street machines, the 2006 Subaru Impreza WRX and the 2006 Mitsubishi Evo IX, unitedly for a comparability test. Find discover which automobile comes discover on top.
25 Responses for "2006 Subaru Impreza WRX STI vs. 2006 Mitsubishi Evo IX"
@monkyzomby both are awd
sti is better for track racing and thats all that really matters. and as if evo sounds better, it sounds woosy compared to sti
1:23 pussy comment, Noises get harsh XD. It’s called wild baby!
yeah, the interior on the evo just looks so fuckin cheasy…sti all the way
@isubaru2662 The sti is the SEAT of the car world, its what people buy when they cant afford a Audi which is what the evo is.
the sti is sick
Ha everyone knows that the Sti is all out better then the EVO. And 0-60 in 5.6… thats a bunch of bull.
i would still get a STi
@wowspare ur a fuckin idiot ur little p.o.s. silvia wouldn’t beat me on a peddle bike u dipshit
@monkyzomby your dumb, both the evo and the sti are awd and neither of those engines are going to be exactly easy to put in, your going to need new engine mounts, drive trains, and definitely a new axle, a new tranny because they wont hook up and the probability is there will be a lot of cutting because the transmission wont be the same length. I suggest not doing that.
HEY ANYBODY HELP! so, I have a 2003 eclipse and I want to put either an evo engine or STI engine, but I’m looking at the subarus engine and it looks like it’s rear wheel drive, but I think it’s front. anyways if anybody knows the answer to that. And I know you can pretty much put any engine into any car if you have the money, but I don’t so does anybody know which would be easier and better? gratzi niggers :^D
i’d take the subaru
Screw the evo…subies are frickin beast
subaru FTW
since when does the evo sound better than the STi.
“The sound when you hit high rpm”… what a homo, that is one of the many great things about the Subabeast-it ROARS!!!! (And no sh!t you need a job to get a car-not all of us eat gold and have the cast of cats sing to us at our b-days…)
The reviewer was bias, you could tell he praised the evo a lot more in every detail than the Subaru. All i wanna know is Who THE FCUK WAS DRIVING THE SUBARU!!! 5.6s from 0-60 my ass!
MITSUBISHI 4 EVER
I LOVE THE LANCER
haha screw the evo.. Subaru anyday in my life and the sounds when you hit high rpm? I LOVEEE the sound of the subaru when it hits high rpms. It’s a beast so.. Im going with the subaru: looks better, better build, more options, Better interior, sounds better, and a beastly engine!
@tvr713 In my opinion, you made a wrong choice. The subaru could beat the evo on the track. Subaru’s build alot better than the evo. I’ve drove both on the track and the evo couldn’t even match up with the Subaru. It couldn’t make the tight turns or keep the speed as the Subaru did. Subaru could even beat the evo on the everyday roads.
my favorite car Subaru Impreza WRX rock~
only reason i dont like either that much (although i would choose the evo if i had to) is because in nz there are so many of both just done up really badly
my nissan silvia will eat both of ‘em any day
@iAmTheRainbowBunchie ay i just upgraded from a 2003 kia rio to an 2009 imprezza and tbh both cars are awesome neva had a single problem with the rio got it to 130km/h without it falling apart, ofc its not a awesome car but it WAS a well made one although the new ones are shit
evo’s r gay inside, looks like a damn kia interior